- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:19:55 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2878 ------- Comment #7 from fsasaki@w3.org 2006-03-13 05:19 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I thought about such simplification at some point, but then I tried to get a > list of 'element within text' for DocBook... There are cases where some > elements can be within text or not depending on the context, which (I think) > means one may have to overwrite a previous rule when going through declaration > (a bit like for translatability). So I'm not sure if we could simplified. Of course for processing you need to assume assigned values, e.g. withinText="yes". But since there is only one value for this data category (which is different from translatability "yes" versus "no"), I thought there is no need for a user to write an attribute. A processor can "assume" this value just from the name of the <its:withinText> element. That is: the override you are describing can work only relying on this name > > Maybe the terminology rule could be simplified like that? > I think so.
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 05:19:56 UTC