- From: Lieske, Christian <christian.lieske@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:27:33 +0100
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Hi, I would be in favour since xml:lang is of great importance to i18n and l10n. Best regards, Christian -----Original Message----- From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 15:09 To: public-i18n-its@w3.org Subject: On language tags Hi Yves, all, Currently the language tags are only in the techniques document, and we refer to xml:lang. I am just wondering if we should consider a language attribute for the tagset document (not deciding yet whether for the last call or not), to be able to use RFC 3066 bis. This new RFC for language tags is much more powerful than the RFC 3066 (which is the basis for xml:lang). Any ideas? Cheers, Felix
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 09:28:03 UTC