- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:16:19 +0900
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Message-ID: <43FD6143.6050704@w3.org>
.. are at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html and below as
text.
- Felix
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
i18n ITS working group
22 Feb 2006
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0140.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-irc
Attendees
Present
Christian, Felix, Goutam, Richard, Yves
Regrets
Andrzej, Sebastian
Chair
Yves
Scribe
Felix
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]last call f2f meeting scheduling
2. [6]tech plenary f2f
3. [7]action items
4. [8]let's go through the current bugs
5. [9]techniques document
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
last call f2f meeting scheduling
yves: currently we thought of the two weeks after www conference
... and the xtech conference
... we thought of may 31-2
richard: I might have to attend an SSML workshop
... I need to get confirmation on this
yves: I don't know if we would have a sponsor for the location of
the SSML workshop
<scribe> scribe missed location of workshop :)
richard: why did you plan that time?
yves: it was hard to commit people for the other two weeks
... maybe we should wait and see if it is a problem
richard: I will find out asap
tech plenary f2f
<scribe> see
[11]http://www.w3.org/International/its/ftf-200602-Mandelieu.html
for more info
[11] http://www.w3.org/International/its/ftf-200602-Mandelieu.html
action items
<scribe> ACTION: Continue conformance discussion on the mailing
list. (ONGOING) [recorded in
[12]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action01]
yves: Christian and Felix worked on it
felix describes the rationale for the mail on conformance
felix: see
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0
231.html
[13]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JanMar/0231.html
action items 2,3,4: all done
<scribe> ACTION: Yves to send something on docbook before the tech
plenary to the list. (DONE) [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action02]
Yves: Norm sent an answer
Felix: Sebastian and me might meet Norm next week
<scribe> ACTION: All to think of how to organize examples inside and
outside the specification. (ONGOING) [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action03]
Yves: has to do with test suites
... and related to discussion on editor call, of sharing the
examples between the techniques / tagset document
<scribe> ACTION: Christian and Felix to provide examples for tests,
and see if we can come up with a common set of conf level (DROPPED)
[recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action04]
Yves: this is like the other action item above
<scribe> ACTION: Everybody to read the specification and comment
until the publication date. (DONE) [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action05]
felix: the draft will be published on the 22nd (today)
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to add a strong statement on the top of the
document about "editors" copy. (PENDING) [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> ACTION: Owners of the modularizations to keep working on
them. (ONGOING) [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action07]
christian: as for DITA:
... I would like to do s.t. similar as Yves has done for DocBook
... he sent suggestions to Norm as the maintainer of the DocBook
schema
... and asked him if this is the right way to do it
... I could also suggest at the next DITA sub TC call
... that somebody from DITA takes ITS and see how it works with DITA
... in DocBook, you have e.g. specialization layers
... which might be a challenge for integration of ITS
... in DITA, you have other schema design issues
yves: good idea
... you might provide them with something
... take an example of DITA+ITS
... we have not heard from Damian
... and open doc
... I asked him last week, I'll send an reminder next week
... I started also s.t. on XHTML
<scribe> ACTION: Yves to work on XHTML + ITS modularization
[recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action08]
yves: the problem with XHTML I had was:
... as they describe how to have MathML
... they say that this makes the document invalid
... I don't know how to address that, but I will make a note on it
let's go through the current bugs
<YvesS>
[21]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&
order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=ITS
[21]
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=ITS
yves: 2618: proposal from "translateAddinfo"
... it was from Francois, I think
... we should address it at some point
felix: we don't have to address this now
... only if the comment is made during last call
yves: 2619 Complexity of precedence rules for "scope" (or
"selectors")
Christian: on 2618 again:
... can we not close this one now?
... is this not a part of translation properties?
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to close 2618 and write a mail to Francois
about it [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action09]
Christian: I see the same need as Francois sees
... I only think that this is not the scope of ITS
Yves: we have to make clear that we only address localizability
issues, not the localization process
felix: how about closing this, and to go to Francois?
yves: ok.
<scribe> ACTION: felix to close 2619 and to go back to Francois
[recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action10]
yves: 2761: part of conformance discussion
... 2808: not in the spec yet, but we have a proposal
<scribe> ACTION: felix to write s.t. about comment 2808 in the spec
and close the comment [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action11]
yves: 2876
... about versioning
... important issue, where was some discussion
... how should we address that?
... there are two parts to that:
... the version number in the URI
... and there is version information in the markup
... the latter could be addressed via namespace differences or an
"version" attribute
felix: I would not change the namespace URI
Yves: seems good
<chriLi> What do the CSS and XSL guys do?
christian: I'm not sure if I am clear about the topic:
... versioning the spec versus versioning the tag set
yves: I had a confusion about the URI of the spec, versus the URI of
the namespace
felix: the versioning story could be only a story of the "ITS markup
declaration" product
<scribe> ACTION: Yves to write s.t. about versioning for the tagset
document [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action12]
Yves: bug 2877
... the data category
christian: I had a look at dita and docbook
... and tried to figure out how it works
... this might concern other data categories as well
... questions where: should we have in the techniques document s.t.
about equivelant markup?
... e.g. should we go for DITA or ITS markup?
... that is important for other data categories as well
... the other point was on how to relate existing terminology markup
to ITS markup / the term data category
<scribe> ACTION: christian to make a bug on the relation between
existing markup and data categories [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action13]
yves: 2878
... I will try the same thing for segmentation
felix: how about having deadlines for making progress?
yves: o.k.
felix: will write an inital proposal to yves
yves: bugs 2881,2,3 have been tackled at the editors call
<scribe> ACTION: tag set editors to integrate discussion result
about bugs 2881,2,3 (results from editor's call) into the tagset
document [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action14]
yves: bug 2890
<scribe> ACTION: felix to integrate bug 2890 into the tag set
document [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action15]
<YvesS> [29]http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0601Techniques
[29] http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0601Techniques
techniques document
yves: I made some change, after Christian's proposal
... it is more clear, but I still have not managed to put the
localizer here
... I added some entries for ruby etc.
... currently they are only placeholders
... most of the entries are currently empty
... one thing we could discuss: language specification
... see first item of sec. 2
<YvesS> [30]http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0601TechLangDev
[30] http://esw.w3.org/topic/its0601TechLangDev
felix: how about adding a language attribute to ITS?
richard: the xml:lang attribute definition says "rfc 3066 or its
successor"
... xml:lang exists, and it should be used
... it is not a vague statement "or its successor"
... I hope that the IETF will clarify the situation soon
... we need to check the matching draft though
... we should not define what the values for our own
<scribe> ACTION: felix to bring the xml:lang question to the i18n
core group (esp. Mark, also Addison) [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action16]
Summary of Action Items
[DROPPED] ACTION: Christian and Felix to provide examples for tests,
and see if we can come up with a common set of conf level [recorded
in [32]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: christian to make a bug on the relation between
existing markup and data categories [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action13]
[NEW] ACTION: felix to bring the xml:lang question to the core group
(esp. Mark, also Addison) [recorded in
[34]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action16]
[NEW] ACTION: Felix to close 2618 and write a mail to Francois about
it [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: felix to close 2619 and to go back to Francois
[recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action10]
[NEW] ACTION: felix to integrate bug 2890 into the tag set document
[recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action15]
[NEW] ACTION: felix to write s.t. about comment 2808 in the spec and
close the comment [recorded in
[38]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action11]
[NEW] ACTION: tag set editors to integrate discussion result about
bugs 2881,2,3 (results from editor's call) into the tagset document
[recorded in
[39]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action14]
[NEW] ACTION: Yves to work on XHTML + ITS modularization [recorded
in [40]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: Yves to write s.t. about versioning for the tagset
document [recorded in
[41]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action12]
[PENDING] ACTION: All to think of how to organize examples inside
and outside the specification. [recorded in
[42]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action03]
[PENDING] ACTION: Continue conformance discussion on the mailing
list. [recorded in
[43]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action01]
[PENDING] ACTION: Felix to add a strong statement on the top of the
document about "editors" copy. [recorded in
[44]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action06]
[PENDING] ACTION: Owners of the modularizations to keep working on
them. [recorded in
[45]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action07]
[DONE] ACTION: Everybody to read the specification and comment until
the publication date. [recorded in
[46]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action05]
[DONE] ACTION: Yves to send something on docbook before the tech
plenary to the list. [recorded in
[47]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/22-i18nits-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [48]scribe.perl version 1.127
([49]CVS log)
$Date: 2006/02/23 07:12:44 $
[48] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[49] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 07:17:13 UTC