- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:45:26 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2621 ------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org 2006-01-19 15:45 ------- input to conformance discussion: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xml-events-20031014/Overview.html#s_event_module_conformance I like this definition because the properties of XML Events are very similar to ITS: they are not stand-alone document types, they are supposed to be integreated into host languages like HTML or DITA. I think we could write a conformance section like in the link above, with - document conformance - host language conformance - instead of user agend conformance a "ITS processor" conformance. That is the product we still have to define.
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 15:45:31 UTC