- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 05:21:18 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3361 ------- Comment #1 from fsasaki@w3.org 2006-06-19 05:21 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > From MemoQ developers: > > Issue #2: "ITS doesn't define the procedure if rules defined in external > resources aren't accessible (may ignore the existence of the unreachable > link)." > > > Comment from Yves: > "Do we need to define a behavior for unreachable rules? Maybe just saying the > processor should generate an error?" > > > Comment from Sebastian: > "I think we should say this is a fatal error." > I agree. One issue with this that we do not define any error behavior for ITS processors, and I think ITS is simple enough to avoid long error descriptions like e.g. in http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#error-summary . Maybe it is enough to stay with our "declarative" descriptions how external rules MUST (RFC 2119) be interpreted, and add a non-normative ITS "processing" description. See also my comment at http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3360#c0 .
Received on Monday, 19 June 2006 05:21:22 UTC