- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:12:59 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3291 ------- Comment #1 from ysavourel@translate.com 2006-05-31 15:12 ------- >From the viewpoint of re-using the name 'select' vs. 'selector'. No reason, except maybe because it's not exactly the same as xsl:select. >From the semantic viewpoint: its:selector is always an absolution XPath expression (never relative) and it always point to an elemnt or an attribute. So it's not exactly the same as xsl:select.
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2006 15:13:08 UTC