- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:04:37 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3292
Summary: XHTML Module for XHTML 1.1 or XHTML 2.0
Product: ITS
Version: LastCall
Platform: All
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060414/
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ITS tagset
AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
ReportedBy: karl@w3.org
QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org
The content of this document is of great values. I see one direct benefit for
XHTML users, but I fear a possible rebuttal by these same users. They will not
like to have to use yet another namespace in an XHTML document. Though there
might be a possibility.
Have you thought about proposing an XHTML Module to the HTML WG (in addition to
this work not a replacement)?
See "How to create XHTML Family modules and markup languages for fun and
profit"
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Guide/xhtml-m12n-tutorial/
Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2006 03:04:41 UTC