- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:04:37 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3292 Summary: XHTML Module for XHTML 1.1 or XHTML 2.0 Product: ITS Version: LastCall Platform: All URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060414/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ITS tagset AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org ReportedBy: karl@w3.org QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org The content of this document is of great values. I see one direct benefit for XHTML users, but I fear a possible rebuttal by these same users. They will not like to have to use yet another namespace in an XHTML document. Though there might be a possibility. Have you thought about proposing an XHTML Module to the HTML WG (in addition to this work not a replacement)? See "How to create XHTML Family modules and markup languages for fun and profit" http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Guide/xhtml-m12n-tutorial/
Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2006 03:04:41 UTC