- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:50:30 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3058 ------- Comment #2 from fsasaki@w3.org 2006-04-10 15:50 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > As far as I understand there is no issue here. > Shall we close this bug? > -ys > I had a look at http://norman.walsh.name/2005/10/21/dita#conref and I am still wondering: what happens with translatability information if I apply the conref mechanism of DITA? Examples from DITA: compare 1) <note conref="#topic1/usefulnote"/> versus 2) <note><p>...</p></note> if I write a rule like <its:translateRule its:select="//note" its:translate="no"/> in ITS, the translatability information would inherit to the <p> element in the case of 2), but not in the case of 1). However, if I understand DITA correct, 1) and 2) should behave the same in terms of translatability. Am I missing something, or do we have to tell the DITA folks that they can't apply ITS in a useful way if they use @conref?
Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 15:50:34 UTC