- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:49:35 -0600
- To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001e01c65a5a$df008eb0$8f05a8c0@Breizh>
Hi everyone, Piggy-backing on some time left at the end of the editors' teleconference today, Christian, Felix and I were able to discuss of the "Shall ITS allows several <rules> elements in a single document?" question as well as the "What the ITS xlink:href link points to exactly?" question, that were generated from the Versionning discussion. And we even reached a consensus that hopefully you will share: We propose that: -#1- Only one <rules> element should be allowed per document. We think it covers most of the cases, and allowing more than one would result in quite a few headaches in processing/conformance while not adding much benefits. This is a change from the current specification insofar as we didn't have any explicit wording forbidding several <rules> to be in a single file (and therefore it was implicitely allowed). -#2- The xlink:href attributes of the <rules> element points to an arbitrary XML document that contains a <rules> element. That element can be the root element or elsewhere in the document (and there is only one per #1). This is a clarification of the linking mechanism rather than a change. The next updated specification should include a section describing the linking mechanism as we agreed already. If you see any problem with either #1 or #2 please make sure to post your comments. Cheers, P.S. The discussion on versionning is still going on: See this thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006AprJun/0015.html
Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 15:50:01 UTC