On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote: > That doesn’t preclude anyone to use the other options if they really want > to go that road. I agree with this. So even if the consensus were to move towards ITS module defined space and lang that could live on <mrk><-><sm/><em/>, we should still have the proposed informative text how these features can be extracted using core only.. Of course if we went for the additional attributes, we would need to move that category from fully supported to partially supported. It think there is a value in this being 1) accessible for all core only agents 2) not violating the xml semantics of those attributes 3) simplifying the <mrk> reduction for ITS roundtrip Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer LRC | CNGL | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 *cellphone: +353-86-0222-158* facsimile: +353-6120-2734 http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:45:54 UTC