- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:58:23 -0700
- To: "'XLIFF Main List'" <xliff@lists.oasis-open.org>, <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
I agree Jirka.
But I think the URN is the official OASIS way: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3121
Cheers,
-ys
-----Original Message-----
From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@kosek.cz]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 7:35 AM
To: Felix Sasaki; Yves Savourel
Cc: XLIFF Main List; public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: ITS Module URI
On 26.11.2014 15:13, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> the last mail I saw on this is here
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2014Nov/0029.ht
> ml and we did not have a call or other mails on this later. Like you
> wrote on above mail I am also fine with both.
I'm probably coming to late at the party, but using URL instead of URN would be better IMHO, as there could be some documentation put on that URL. URNs tends to confuse people.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML and Web consulting and training services DocBook/DITA customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 16:58:56 UTC