- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:10:35 -0700
- To: "XLIFF Main List" <xliff@lists.oasis-open.org>, <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Hi David, all, > I believe that the three rules should be fine together, As I say, I like seeing things in action (e.g. with overriding precedence, etc.) before saying it works or not :) The sooner we get that rule file written the better. For example, it actually looks like we will need 4 rules, not 3, as there is no locNoteTypePointer, so <note> will need two rules to cover the alert/description cases. > ...as long as we agree what is the default for comment annotations with value. > I suggested it is alert, as the xliff <note> has deafult priority 1, > but it is pretty much arbitrary since ITS does not specify a default. Actually ITS does specify a default for local notes and it's 'description'. So we'll have to decide which one makes sense from an XLIFF viewpoint. We should really try instead of discussing. But I don't have time for now. Cheers, -yves
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 15:11:04 UTC