- From: David Filip <davidf@davidf.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 01:54:29 +0000
- To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
- Cc: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Message-ID: <CANw5LKmuAR8kHQQFMM9HrnY0_+NhMz6YRgBQiTTB+1Tdheyxkw@mail.gmail.com>
I don't see a value in calling the namespace anything else than its. The OASIS namespace is clearly a different namespace than the w3c one and prefixes are anyway arbitrary.. dF is AFK, so please bear with the typos and call me at +353860222158 if my answer seems insufficient.. +1 for "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:xits:2.1" and "xits" -----Original Message----- From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] Sent: 07 November 2014 13:10 To: 'public-i18n-its-ig' Subject: ITS Module namespace Hi all, Currently the 2.1 draft uses "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:its:2.1" for the ITS module URI and "its" for the recommended prefix. We discussed a different prefix to avoid confusion with the traditional "its" prefix. Should we then use "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:xits:2.1" and "xits" in the specification? Deciding soon will help avoid having to fix unit tests and examples later. Thanks, -yves ------------------------------ VistaTEC Ltd. Registered in Ireland 268483. Registered Office, VistaTEC House, 700, South Circular Road, Kilmainham. Dublin 8. Ireland. The information contained in this message, including any accompanying documents, is confidential and is intended only for the addressee(s). The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately. ------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 9 November 2014 01:54:58 UTC