- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 06:10:08 -0700
- To: "'public-i18n-its-ig'" <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Hi all, Currently the 2.1 draft uses "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:its:2.1" for the ITS module URI and "its" for the recommended prefix. We discussed a different prefix to avoid confusion with the traditional "its" prefix. Should we then use "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:xits:2.1" and "xits" in the specification? Deciding soon will help avoid having to fix unit tests and examples later. Thanks, -yves
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 13:10:36 UTC