Re: ITS Mapping Update - What is the plan?

Renat, all,

the XLIFF TC hasn't started yet any specific work on transferring the wiki
content into XLIFF spec core/module structure. The obvious reasons being
work on the 2.0 publication and vacations..

This said, work on that is about to start as of mid September, so imminent.

If you have specific feedback to the wiki mapping, it would be great if
you'd shared and it, got vetted and incorporated in the wiki text within
days, so that it makes the transition to the XLIFF spec.

This said, it would be great to have Logrus on the XLIFF TC team[*], so
that you can have continued influence onto the ITS 2.0 incorporation into
the XLIFF 2.1 spec.

The spec should be technically stable by the end of 2014 and reference
implementations should be more or less in place in November 2014.
If these are hit then we can have 2.1 with full ITS support next summer..

[*]
Being an associate member with only one representative is affordable. This
is how Yves contributes. Individual membership is even cheaper..

Cheers
dF



Dr. David Filip
=======================
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer
LRC | CNGL | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
*cellphone: +353-86-0222-158*
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie


On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> wrote:

> +1 for hearing the feedback. We are about to start work on XLIFF 2.0
> support in Ocelot.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> > On 22 Aug 2014, at 06:35, "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Renat,
> >
> >> Am 21.08.2014 um 20:39 schrieb Renat Bikmatov (Logrus.Net) <
> renat.bikmatov@logrus.net>:
> >>
> >> Hi Yves,
> >>
> >> We are considering to further develop our ITS 2.0 implementation
> project aimed at visualization of content and ITS metadata - this time for
> XLIFF 2.0 content. I asked the developer to look at the ITS 2.0 mapping
> schema for XLIFF 2.0 (
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping), and he has
> found several inconsistences and/or omissions. So my question is:
> >>
> >> Do you think it is worth for us to participate in further development
> and debugging of the current ITS-to-XLIFF 2.0 mapping specification (if
> this is still in progress) - OR- Does it make sense to wait until ITS 2.0
> is implemented as XLIFF 2.x Module (hopefully, in near future)?
> >
> >
> > Yves may have a different answer, here is mine: the mapping is being
> developed in the wiki and nothing else has happened in XLIFF TC about it.
> So it would make a lot of sense to know about the inconsistencies and
> omissions here before the mapping is finalized.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Felix
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Renat Bikmatov | IT and Localization Solutions Architect | Senior
> Localization Project Manager | +7 (495) 646-3564, ext. 110
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 5:48 PM
> >> To: public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
> >> Cc: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> >> Subject: ITS Mapping Update
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> (CCing the XLIFF TC for information, as the idea is to make this into a
> module)
> >>
> >> An update on the ITS mapping for XLIFF 2:
> >>
> >> As discussed in Dublin last month and in this morning ITS-IG call, we
> are looking at classifying the ITS data categories into several classes:
> >>
> >> - the one for which there is a direct XLIFF mapping (so nothing to
> implement),
> >> - the ones partially covered in XLIFF,
> >> - the ones without equivalent in XLIFF
> >> - the ones that are not metadata (and therefore not really to be
> 'mapped')
> >> - and several ones not mapped yet
> >>
> >> The latest draft is here:
> >> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_2.0_Mapping
> >>
> >> Feedback and suggestions welcome, especially on the data categories not
> mapped yet, like Directionality, Storage Size, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> -yves
> >
> >
> > ************************************************************
> > VistaTEC Ltd. Registered in Ireland 268483.
> > Registered Office, VistaTEC House, 700, South Circular Road,
> > Kilmainham. Dublin 8. Ireland.
> >
> > The information contained in this message, including any accompanying
> > documents, is confidential and is intended only for the addressee(s).
> > The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this
> > message is strictly forbidden. If you have received this message in
> > error please notify the sender immediately.
> > ************************************************************
> ************************************************************
> VistaTEC Ltd. Registered in Ireland 268483.
> Registered Office, VistaTEC House, 700, South Circular Road,
> Kilmainham. Dublin 8. Ireland.
>
> The information contained in this message, including any accompanying
> documents, is confidential and is intended only for the addressee(s).
> The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this
> message is strictly forbidden. If you have received this message in
> error please notify the sender immediately.
> ************************************************************
>
>
>