- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:51:18 +0900
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: "garfieldnate@gmail.com" <garfieldnate@gmail.com>, "public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org" <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Hello Yves, others, On 2013/09/19 20:43, Yves Savourel wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > > >> First, is "itsx" a prefix for another namespace > >> besides the one that "itsxlf" represents? > > > > itsxlf is for http://www.w3.org/ns/its-xliff/ which holds the markup to 'bridge' ITS and XLIFF. > > > > itsx is for http://www.w3.org/2008/12/its-extensions which holds the markup for extensions to ITS: This was used in ITS 1.0 to define potential markup for 2.0. We can still continue to do that for 2.0. In general, using less namespaces is desirable. Base vocabulary and extensions may coexist in the same namespace, and this simplifies things for users. Regards, Martin. > For a brief period of time the mapping was using the 'itsx' namespace because we didn't have itsxlf yet. > > > > > >> Second, I think that "targetLocaleRule" was supposed > >> to be "targetPointerRule". > > > > Indeed. I've fixed it. > > > > Cheers, > > -yves >
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 07:52:27 UTC