- From: David Filip <davidf@davidf.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:52:32 +0100
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Cc: Nathan Glenn <garfieldnate@gmail.com>, public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANw5LKn_hLv8_uRznLNJeWAWYVdPAxk5p_mS40fA0un41DYTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
How would the IRIs be concatenated? A pipe? Does it need an escaping mechanism? Cheers dF dF is AFK, sent from a mobile phone.. On 19 Sep 2013 18:55, "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote: > > The document mentions both itsxlf:externalResourceRef and > itsx:externalResourceRef. > > Do the itsx ones need to be fixed? > > Yes, good catch Nathan. > Done. > > BTW this bring up an unresolved issue: we had some discussion about > externalResourceRef and the case of having several resources on > the same element. > > See: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2013Sep/0003.html > > Felix pointed to that case we have here: > http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/#EX-externalresource-2 > where <video> has two external references. > > I was proposing to use a list of IRI (so maybe itsxlf:externalResourceRefs > vs itsxlf:externalResourceRef) > > Thoughts anyone? > -yves > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> > wrote: > > First, the value of "x-its-translate-yes" is mentioned > > for the attribute 'mtype' in a <mrk> element. > > This value is, however, not mentioned anywhere in the > > actual XLIFF 1.2 spec. Is this something planned for 1.3? > > Is it something that will be added via the itsxlf namespace? > > This is more curiosity than practicality. > > As David noted, this uses the 1.2 naming convention for user-defined > values. > > > > Second, localization notes are supported via the <note> element, > > but the document only mentions the use of general <note>'s. > > The default value for a <note> element's 'annotates' attribute > > is "general". The other possible values are "target" and "source", > > indicating that the note applies either to the <source> or the > > <target> element contents. Is this to be supported, as well? > > By which, of course, I mean, is it recommended that implementers > > support this or is it to be ignored? > > Good point. There is no reason to avoid using 'annotates'. We should add > examples. > > Cheers, > -yves > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 20:52:58 UTC