AW: Re: Update to MQM documentation and one question

Well, you have taken a great gathering potential answers for mqm. My suggestion was just to list these in a way easy to identify.

Felix

Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de> schrieb:

>Is the question then specific to MQM, or about representing other systems in general? It seems to me that this problem won't be limited to MQM.
>
>-Arle
>
>
>On 2013 Jun 28, at 19:12 , Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes - I would propose a separate section in the wiki listing the representation options, making clear that we are discussing representation of mqm in (its 2) markup.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Felix
>
>

Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 17:45:58 UTC