- From: Yves Savourel <yves@opentag.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:21:27 -0700
- To: "'Phil Archer'" <phil@philarcher.org>, "'Yves Savourel'" <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Cc: <public-powderwg@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its-ig@w3.org>
Hi Phil, > OK, now I'm being a little lazy - because I'm trying to > expedite this ASAP and I admit to only having seen the > ITS doc for the first time this afternoon. You've kindly > sent us an ITS rules file - is the idea that every POWDER > doc should link to this? Or at least, every POWDER doc > that includes localised tags? Or should we embed the > rules in the schema? The idea is that the rules document is available to whoever needs to localize or preform some linguistic-related tasks on the document. It is certainly not necessary to have the rules in every document instance. Including them in the schema could be a good way to make sure it's readily accessible. Or it could be a separate document (with a link to it in the spec). From the view point of the ITS processor it doesn't really matter. -yves
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:22:07 UTC