- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:29:07 +0100
- To: <ishida@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net> To: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; <ishida@w3.org>; <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>; <public-i18n-geo@w3.org> Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 12:10 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: FW: acronym in title... >I would approach the assistive technology developers and ask what >kind of an indirect relationship they could most readily see >implementing. Will they come to the W3C DOM for this information? >Do we need to get it into MSAA? I think that IBM and other W3C member that create these applications could reply to this. >It would not be hard to write a tool that reads a glossary and >adds things like the language information to HTML attributes where >they appear in the DOM. Then the assistive technology could know that >'Piazza San Marco' was Italian. Hum... i think it would be difficoult to have a full dictionary for all the possible words. But - at now - i have no proposal for solution in my mind :-/ >The problem is that if the HTML Working Group were to introduce an >incompatible change in a minor release like that, who would implement >it? The conventional wisdom is "nobody." And I am not inclined to >second-guess the experts on that point. > >Incompatible changes in HTML are generally not going to be considered >outside the XHTML 2.0 activity, as it is risky to think with the heavy use >of HTML all the time that any incompatible changes will be taken up in >practice, even with the best efforts of the HTML WG. > >XHTML 2.0 is the version that HTML WG is working on. We would have to have >a flaming disaster going on to get an incompatible change released as some >sort of an interim patch, and it is not clear who would implement it. > >Besides, there are too many, too good, ways to do this in ways that >interoperate with HTML 2.0. [cut] >There is also a plugin option for the browser extension. Also an >independent screen scraper like Atomica. So, at least, for the "previous" version all we can do is to "hope" to have - for example - intelligent text readers that read the words in the natural language... Roberto Scano IWA/HWG EMEA Coordinator W3C Advisory Committee Representative for IWA/HWG International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org E-Mail: emea@iwanet.org - w3c-rep@iwanet.org --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 04:29:36 UTC