- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:27:07 -0000
- To: <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
FYI. The enclosed mail outlines WAI's concerns with the term 'rule' applied to the directive part of a technique, and proposes an alternative that seems to have been accepted. RI ============ Richard Ishida W3C tel: +44 1753 480 292 http://www.w3.org/International/ http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm Sent: 28 January 2003 18:02 To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: [techs] proposal to replace use of "rules" Hello, A while ago (january 2002?), when we began making the techniques documents more testable we used the phrase "rules" for the testable statements. For a reminder of what this looks like, refer to the HTML Techniques [1]. We didn't want to use "checkpoint" or "criterion" since we wanted to distinguish the technology-specifics from the general guidelines and checkpoints. However, there are many acknowledged issues with the term "rule." e.g., it could be confused with the 508 rules, it may be interpreted as being too prescriptive. etc. Thus, to continue the discussion about what term to use instead, here is a proposal. First, at the top level we currently have: Guidelines which are made up of checkpoints Checkpoints which are made up of success criteria success criteria I propose that at the technology-specific level we have: (one or many) techniques that show how to meet a top-level success criterion a technique is a combination of: - the technique (e.g., "Use the meta element to...") - examples - descriptions - etc. (all the other stuff from the schema and techniques requirements) for those of you interested in the schema, i think we can continue to use the element "rule" but when we generate documents from the xml we do something along the following: ==== TITLE: the document title Techniques: Use the TITLE element to describe the document. ==== Basically, replace "Rules" with "Techniques." --wendy [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/wcagtech020320.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 09:27:45 UTC