- From: Daniel Yacob <yacob@geez.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 02:05:22 +0000
- To: "public-i18n-ethiopic@w3.org" <public-i18n-ethiopic@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACvO6KAydERxivRGVcXbaujfyJgux8WNPwENWTbp2V-grfCq1w@mail.gmail.com>
...75 years and one month now, I regret that this is belated :-/ Hello everyone, I guess we've all been busy. I had wanted to take a moment this past August 1st to reflect on the 75th anniversary (since Hamle 25, 1934 EC) of the Addis Zemen newspaper's last use of Hulet Neteb (Ethiopic Wordspace) in articles in Vol 2. No. 13. In the next issue a week later (Nahasse 2, 1934) Hulet Neteb was was found no more, gone without a word of explanation, and in its place were the blank spaces in use today. Save for the paper's title which curiously would continue to use it. I've long considered the change in practice by the nation's leading periodical a typographic turning point for the symbol as it entered into the modern era of mass publishing. I'd really like to learn their rationale for doing so. My best guess is that it may have been a cost saving move -reducing ink expense by lowering the volume required, avoiding the cost of producing more printing press tiles for the symbol as the paper's size grew in pages (assumes tile technology was in use), perhaps also labor saving by eliminating the need to manually layout the symbol with the technology in use at the time (certainly a frustration today). We may never know the reason why it was dropped by Addis Zemen. With digital screens and automated layout by software (following well defined rules that ELReq develops), I hope we may yet see a little revival in its utilization. Related, a post that I became too busy to make previously, was to share an experiment in 3 justifications of Ethiopic Wordspace (ragged right, full with wordspace centered, and full with word-bounded style). This was prepared for an author that I was working with to help him decide on a style to use -ultimately he preferred the ragged right. Rather than attach the file of samples to this post, a link to is here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9HehOOosU24V3JUeTRNTC1yVVU regards, -Daniel
Received on Friday, 1 September 2017 02:05:55 UTC