- From: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:18:10 +0800
- To: John C Klensin <john+w3c@jck.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Hi John, Yes, Martin asked Eiso Chan to write a comparison of GB 18030-2000 and GB 18030-2022. Eiso wrote it in https://gitee.com/eisoch/irg/issues/I65U2Z , but received no reply from Martin yet. Fuqiao On 2024-03-19 14:54, John C Klensin wrote: > Fuqiao, > > Have you or your colleagues discussed this with Martin Dürst? > > john > > > --On Tuesday, March 19, 2024 14:08 +0800 Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org> > wrote: > >> A new version of GB 18030 was released in 2023, but >> WHATWG[1][2] and IANA[3] are still referring to the 2005 and >> 2000 versions of it. >> >> Should we do something as a group? Note that this is a >> mandatory standard in China. >> >> Eiso Chan from the clreq group wrote an email to IANA, and >> they asked him to write a comparison of GB 18030-2000 and GB >> 18030-2022. He documented the differences in >> https://gitee.com/eisoch/irg/issues/I65U2Z a few months ago >> (see the U+E8xx code points, for example), but got no reply >> from IANA. >> >> See also https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301119 for >> support in Java. >> >> [1] https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#indexes >> [2] https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/312 >> [3] >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets/character-sets >> .xhtml >>
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2024 02:18:11 UTC