- From: John C Klensin <john+w3c@jck.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:54:11 -0400
- To: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Fuqiao, Have you or your colleagues discussed this with Martin Dürst? john --On Tuesday, March 19, 2024 14:08 +0800 Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org> wrote: > A new version of GB 18030 was released in 2023, but > WHATWG[1][2] and IANA[3] are still referring to the 2005 and > 2000 versions of it. > > Should we do something as a group? Note that this is a > mandatory standard in China. > > Eiso Chan from the clreq group wrote an email to IANA, and > they asked him to write a comparison of GB 18030-2000 and GB > 18030-2022. He documented the differences in > https://gitee.com/eisoch/irg/issues/I65U2Z a few months ago > (see the U+E8xx code points, for example), but got no reply > from IANA. > > See also https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301119 for > support in Java. > > [1] https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#indexes > [2] https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/312 > [3] > https://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets/character-sets > .xhtml >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2024 06:54:23 UTC