- From: Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:27:12 +0200
- To: John C Klensin <john+w3c@jck.com>, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: Internationalization Working Group <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL58czo1MTGo_e9pRxFrSnymQe=iFLk_gJv-kBY+cM+VN+GUrg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello John, I understand your and Martin's point about who should host such a language tag registry. This is a difficult topic, and I am currently not deeply enough involved in both organizations to be able to formulate a useful opinion. About endorsements of proprietary services: that is indeed a misunderstanding. A standards body should host its own service, so that others do not have to refer to proprietary services as the first reference. - Felix On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 15:41, John C Klensin <john+w3c@jck.com> wrote: > Felix, > > Martin's question highlights another issue, one of possible > (likely, I think) confusion between two, apparently similar, > registries hosted by different organizations. I hate to suggest > this given the very sorry state of i18n work in the IETF, but > wouldn't it make more sense to ask the IETF to have IANA set up > a registry for this purpose with appropriate cross references > between the two? > > And, FWIW, I may misunderstand part of your comment but I have > no idea what it means for a standards body to endorse a > collection of proprietary services. > > john > > > --On Friday, September 17, 2021 10:28 +0200 Felix Sasaki > <felix@sasakiatcf.com> wrote: > > > Hello Martin, > > > > The action item is not about language subtags but about > > language tags. > > > > The RDF community has developed several (non standardized) Web > > services that provide information about languages and related > > information, see e.g. http://lexvo.org/ > > The information is accessible as RDF, with unique URIs for > > languages. The unique URIs are also cited in standards like > > DCAT. > > > > Such services are proprietary. The idea of this action item is > > to consider a service, hosted and endorsed by a standards > > body, providing URIs for languages. > > > > Best > > > > Felix > > > > On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 09:28, Martin J. Dürst > > <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > > > >> I'm somewhat confused by this action item. There is the > >> official subtag registry at > >> > >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/lan > >> guage-subtag-registry > >> > >> Why would Unicode have to get involved? > >> > >> Regards, Martin. > >> > >> On 2021-09-16 23:11, Internationalization Working Group Issue > >> Tracker wrote: > >> > I18N-ACTION-1080: Ping unicode about establishing a langtag > >> > online > >> subtag reference > >> > > >> > https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1080 > >> > > >> > Assigned to: Addison Phillips > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >
Received on Saturday, 18 September 2021 18:27:41 UTC