RE: I18N-ACTION-611: Contact martin to see if unicode-xml will be worked on soon so that wg can decide if alternate next steps are needed

Hi Martin,

Thanks Richard. Yes, that's basically the discussion we had in the WG call. If you/Asmus/etc. were to get to or revive this work at some point, that would be great and we certainly wouldn't object to that. But we would like to update the TR version if that work isn't active.

Let me know if you'd prefer a different course of action or have plans to get to this.

Addison

> -----Original Message-----
> From: r12a [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 3:10 AM
> To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: Re: I18N-ACTION-611: Contact martin to see if unicode-xml will be
> worked on soon so that wg can decide if alternate next steps are needed
> 
> On 21/04/2017 12:41, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> > I found the following:
> >
> > On 2017/04/21 00:23, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker
> > wrote:
> >> I18N-ACTION-611: Contact martin to see if unicode-xml will be worked
> >> on soon so that wg can decide if alternate next steps are needed
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/611

> >>
> >> Assigned to: Addison Phillips
> >
> > I seem to remember that in an earlier discussion, I said that I
> > wouldn't get around to work on this very soon, and it would be good to
> > proceed with adding a note to the document.
> >
> > Checking https://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml/, that indeed seems to be
> > what happened in March 2016.
> >
> > Given that, I wonder what kind of changes you are thinking about this
> > time around.
> 
> hi Martin,
> 
> I guess Addison's busy, so i'll pitch in. It's been over a year now since we planned
> to update the document, and still there's no progress, so we're thinking that the
> next change would be to properly deprecate the document and remove all text
> that says that we're working on an update, since we're clearly not.
> 
> cheers,
> ri
>

Received on Saturday, 29 April 2017 17:08:23 UTC