- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:42:31 +0900
- To: <ishida@w3.org>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, intlcore <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On 2016/04/20 01:09, ishida@w3.org wrote: > On 19/04/2016 16:51, Phillips, Addison wrote: >> I wrote WD but meant ED. I know we're not going to publish the EDs as >> WD to TR (too many acronyms?). My point was: why not just put the >> warning box into a copy of the ReSpec version we have, generate as >> Note, and publish that to TR, remove the warning, and move along with >> writing the new version? > > exactly. I thought that was my original suggestion. Sorry if i mangled > it. ;-) > > sounds like we have a plan then. Sounds good to me, too. I was starting from the assumption that the edits that already have gone in might not be desired for the interim "with-warning" Note publication, but if that's not a problem, then all the easier. Regards, Martin. > i'll work on it, maybe tomorrow. > > ri > . >
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2016 08:43:06 UTC