W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > April to June 2016

RE: I18N-ACTION-507: Double check handling of note status for unicode-xml while we work on it

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 15:51:34 +0000
To: "ishida@w3.org" <ishida@w3.org>, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, intlcore <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <98da20a13eb04c19a3c9967f565a765f@EX13D08UWB002.ant.amazon.com>
I wrote WD but meant ED. I know we're not going to publish the EDs as WD to TR (too many acronyms?). My point was: why not just put the warning box into a copy of the ReSpec version we have, generate as Note, and publish that to TR, remove the warning, and move along with writing the new version?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ishida@w3.org [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:19 AM
> To: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>; Martin J. Dürst
> <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; intlcore <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: I18N-ACTION-507: Double check handling of note status for
> unicode-xml while we work on it
> 
> On 19/04/2016 15:08, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> > Why don't we add the warning to the current github (Respec) version
> > and Note-ify it? Then we can make WD versions with edits after that
> > (removing the warning). If a couple of corrections have already been
> > made, that won't hurt anything.
> 
> because we're not planning on making WD versions, so no need to
> complicate things.
> 
> ri
> 

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 15:52:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:02:12 UTC