W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: [DPUB-ANNOTATION-UC] Comment on title or on publication? [I18N-ISSUE-457]

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:43:52 +0000
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "public-digipub@w3.org" <public-digipub@w3.org>
CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <02947913-1A8F-4CA7-AEEB-A7790349A2A9@adobe.com>
Good catch!

I would also point out that while the use cases there for cross-version annotations exist, there also exists the equivalent requirement for per-version annotations.  The model needs to support both.

Leonard




On 10/10/15, 4:21 PM, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com> wrote:

>Hello Dpub,
>
>Here is the third and last comment.
>
>Description:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-annotation-uc/

>
>    2.1.1 Comment on title or on publication?
>
>    The title of this use case suggests that the comment is on the title string. But the body of the use case is about commentary associated with the publication itself. In addition, it is worth noting that even electronic editions of a publication can have multiple versions. [this last is later discussed to some degree in 2.3.2]
>
>Regards (for I18N),
>
>Addison
>
>[1] https://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/457

>
>Addison Phillips
>Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
>Chair (W3C I18N WG)
>
>Internationalization is not a feature.
>It is an architecture.
>
Received on Sunday, 11 October 2015 15:44:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 11 October 2015 15:44:28 UTC