[DPUB-ANNOTATION-UC] Comment on title or on publication? [I18N-ISSUE-457]

• From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
• Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:21:29 +0000
• To: "public-digipub@w3.org" <public-digipub@w3.org>
• CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <902e64c3e1e54d44bf80dc916073299f@EX13D08UWB003.ant.amazon.com>

Hello Dpub,

Here is the third and last comment.

Description:
    http://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-annotation-uc/


    2.1.1 Comment on title or on publication?

    The title of this use case suggests that the comment is on the title string. But the body of the use case is about commentary associated with the publication itself. In addition, it is worth noting that even electronic editions of a publication can have multiple versions. [this last is later discussed to some degree in 2.3.2]

Regards (for I18N),

Addison

[1] https://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/457


Addison Phillips
Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

Received on Saturday, 10 October 2015 20:22:02 UTC