- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:14:50 +0000
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- CC: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com>, Edward O’Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Hi Mike, > > OK, given that at this point I think it’s unlikely we’re going to get UAs > interested in implementing that lower requirement, I’ve filed a issue against > the current in-development version of the Notifications spec proposing that > the requirement simply be to pass the value on as-is. > > https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/issues/46 Thanks. I commented on the thread developing there. > > > An even lower level of syntactical requirement is the 'obs-language-tag' > > construct, which has a very simple regex. Many specifications prefer > > to mandate this level of "content checking", even though "valid > > language tag" is always recommended to authors. > > Right, I’ve filed a separate issue suggesting that the spec define an actual > document-conformance requirement (aka authoring requirement) for > BCP-47 validity of the lang value. For the record, #47. I added a link to this thread there. > > > Note that the text in your test wouldn't necessarily appear > > right-aligned. A better test would include some actual right-to-left > > text so that the word order can be compared (even if the host > > environment displays the text in a left-to-right layout). See the > > examples here [3], perhaps. > > OK, I’ll update that test case. > Thanks, Addison
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 22:15:22 UTC