- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 19:24:49 +0000
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
All, I reviewed CSS Flexbox quickly just now, whose LC ends today. I didn't see any I18N substantive issues. In general, it continues in the tradition of excellent consideration by CSS of direction, writing mode, and such. I have a few nits that I observed while looking into the text, which follow. I will trackerize these and forward as personal comments to CSS-WG. Section 2 http://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#box-model Although the text refers in a number of places to direction in an appropriate way, it might be useful to explicitly say here that the 'start' and 'end' terms appear in some documents in a different location than the top/left and bottom/right side as shown in the illustration. Section 4.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#abspos-items Editorial Nit: Why are there three sheep in this section? Section 5.3 http://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#flex-flow-property Example 5 reads, in part, "Some examples of valid flows in an English (left-to-right, horizontal writing mode) document:". This is good, but slightly misleadingly phrased. Perhaps "Some examples of valid flows in a left-to-right, horizontal writing mode document (such as found in the English language):" Addison Phillips Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126) Chair (W3C I18N WG) Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture.
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 19:25:20 UTC