Re: I18N-ISSUE-357: FSI LRO ... PDF or LRI ... PDF ? [css-writing-modes]

Err, no. The spec is right, since there is no new override character to 
go with RLI/LRI.

Sorry for the noise.
RI

On 20/06/2014 08:33, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> I18N-ISSUE-357: FSI LRO ... PDF or LRI ... PDF ? [css-writing-modes]
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/357
>
> Raised by: Richard Ishida
> On product: css-writing-modes
>
> 2.2 Embeddings and Overrides: the unicode-bidi property
> isolate-override
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20140320/#valuedef-isolate-override
>
> "Following clause HL3 [UAX9], for inline boxes this corresponds to inserting an FSI (U+2068) followed by an LRO (U+202D), for direction: ltr, or RLO (U+202E), for direction: rtl at the start of the box, and a PDF (U+202C) followed by PDI (U+2069) at the end of the box. [UAX9] For other boxes, this value is exactly equivalent to bidi-override."
>
> Shouldn't this equate isolate-override to RLI/LRI...PDI?
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 10:39:23 UTC