- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:38:55 +0100
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Err, no. The spec is right, since there is no new override character to go with RLI/LRI. Sorry for the noise. RI On 20/06/2014 08:33, Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > I18N-ISSUE-357: FSI LRO ... PDF or LRI ... PDF ? [css-writing-modes] > > http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/357 > > Raised by: Richard Ishida > On product: css-writing-modes > > 2.2 Embeddings and Overrides: the unicode-bidi property > isolate-override > http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20140320/#valuedef-isolate-override > > "Following clause HL3 [UAX9], for inline boxes this corresponds to inserting an FSI (U+2068) followed by an LRO (U+202D), for direction: ltr, or RLO (U+202E), for direction: rtl at the start of the box, and a PDF (U+202C) followed by PDI (U+2069) at the end of the box. [UAX9] For other boxes, this value is exactly equivalent to bidi-override." > > Shouldn't this equate isolate-override to RLI/LRI...PDI? > > > >
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 10:39:23 UTC