Re: i18n WG position on Issue-172 "restore <rb> as an optional element"

On 02/14/2012 07:27 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 05:15 PM, Richard Ishida wrote:
>> The Internationalization Working Group will therefore not formally
>> pursue the issue further at this time. In particular, the
>> Internationalization Working Group will not submit or endorse any change
>> proposal for issue-172 at this time, and asks that other interested
>> parties consider not pursuing this issue further at this time, so that
>> this issue can be closed without prejudice for now and re-opened later
>> if necessary.
> Just want to make it clear what the consequences are, given that we are
> in Last Call and past February 11th, if this is closed without prejudice
> at this time it will be closed without prejudice and DEFERRED.
> While we have yet to define the criteria for reopening DEFERRED issues,
> please assume that the bar will be significantly higher than it is now.
> Please let us know before February 21st if this is not how you want this
> issue to be resolved, otherwise we will close it without prejudice and
> mark the issue as DEFERRED.

As we have heard no objections, I am now marking the issue as closed and 

- Sam Ruby

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:25:41 UTC