- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:26:50 -0700
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On 05/25/2011 09:13 AM, Phillips, Addison wrote: >>> >>> That said, the Namespaces problem and the Selectors problem are >>> similar problems (from opposite sides). As a result, we can either: >> >> Actually, they have one major difference: Namespaces do not interact with >> anything outside CSS. Their matching is entirely internal to CSS, so problems >> involving normalization of the source markup or the DOM do not apply. >> > > The matching is entirely internal to CSS, so a stronger normalization > requirement could be applied to matching (if we were so inclined). > However, I don't believe that this really alters the recommendation > as given. Or are you suggesting that namespace prefixes ought to require > a specific normalization form (in order to be valid)? It might make sense to require CSS identifiers to parsed into a particular normalization form, and exposed to the DOM in that form. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 16:27:20 UTC