- From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:05:54 +0200
- To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'URI'" <uri@w3.org>, <hybi@ietf.org>, <uri-review@ietf.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
URI restrictions are not an anachronism. Imagine an Englishman with no knowledge of Japanese and no pocket translator to access a resource under a Japanese IRI that he has printed on paper. Good luck with that. Best regards, Chris -----Original Message----- From: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:uri-review-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 9:55 PM To: URI; hybi@ietf.org; uri-review@ietf.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes > I've found that confusion tends to surround when an IRI is > happily being an IRI and when it needs to be mapped down to a URI. I'm still confused as to why we still have URIs at all. They're such an anachronism.
Received on Friday, 4 September 2009 20:06:30 UTC