- From: Simon Spero <ses@unc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:16:03 -0400
- To: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Cc: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1af06bde0906231516o438ed930t52e4f6caaf80dc95@mail.gmail.com>
You're probably right on this; I brought the the issue up last year in an attempt to show the the language tag hack did not even solve the problem it was addressing ( i.e. classification schemes don't have the same properties as natural languages ). Simon On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>wrote: > I understand the problem, though I am not sure if we should push for this > (or rather I) in a comment on the proposed recommendation, since it is not a > problem of the usage of language tags in SKOS which Martin and I mentioned, > but rather a general SKOS design problem. But we will see what the group > discusses on tomorrows call. > > Felix > > 2009/6/24 Simon Spero <ses@unc.edu> > > There are several other serious problems with the current SKOS draft, but I >> will limit myself here to an issue with the use of prefLabel and language >> tags that has not been mentioned in this thread: a concept can have multiple >> classification numbers from the same scheme. >> >> For example, many library of congress subject headings are associated with >> mutiple Dewey Decimal numbers. >> >> Since there can only be one prefLabel per concept per language, this >> presents a problem. >> >> Simon // not as big a problem as the redefinition of broader though >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 22:16:43 UTC