- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:46:16 +0100
- To: ishida@w3.org, www-html-editor@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Thanks. We have tried to address this by making certain that people understand that "key" is an abstraction and does not correlate to a "key code". Please see the latest editor's draft for full details. http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml-access-20081023/ Best wishes, Steven Pemberton On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:12:28 +0200, <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/WD-xhtml-access-20080526/ > > Comment 2 > At > http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0806-xhtml-access/Overview.html > Editorial/substantive: S > Tracked by: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 3.1.2 > [http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/WD-xhtml-access-20080526/#sec_3.1.2.] > > Comment: > It isn't clear that this section has taken into account the potential > difference between key codes and the characters that may result from a > key press on a given keyboard. It seems to assume that the character on > a key cap == the key code identifier == the character produced by > pressing that key == the character that is the value of the key > attribute. > > This is not always the case when you take into account a variety of > keyboards serving various different locales. > > Please provide some precision as to how a key attribute value is > associated with keyboard events. (Note that this has proved to be a > difficult topic for the specification of DOM3 keyboard events.) > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 14:46:33 UTC