RE: [SSML11] i18n comment 5: RFC 4647 references

My notes from Beijing say Ok to make this change.

RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/blog/
http://rishida.net/

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org
> Sent: 07 April 2008 16:22
> To: dburnett@voxeo.com; jim@larson-tech.com; ashimura@w3.org;
> scott.mcglashan@hp.com; public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: [SSML11] i18n comment 5: RFC 4647 references
> 
> 
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-speech-synthesis11-20080317/
> 
> Comment 5
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0804-ssml11/Overview.html
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Tracked by: RI
> 
> Location in reviewed document:
> 3.2.1 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-speech-synthesis11-20080317/#S3.2.1]
> 
> Comment:
>  Reference BCP 47, "Matching of Language Tags" might be better than RFC
4647
> references or at least RFC 4647 or its successor. This is to guard against
issues if
> RFC 4647 is replaced by a new RFC number. We do not expect future changes
to
> that RFC to cause problems for the SSML spec.
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 19:13:44 UTC