Re: [widgets] i18n

Marcos,

Writing personally - not for I18N core

RFC3066 is referenced frequently - it has been superseded by RFC4646 and 
it would be good idea to update the references in your document.
 
Marcos Caceres wrote:
> Hi i18n Core,
> Please disregard the i18n model I proposed in my previous email. We
> have spec'd out a new model [1] (based on model 2 proposed
> previously). WAF would still be very interested in hearing your
> thoughts on what we have come up with and also any thoughts you might
> have about our configuration document format from an i18n perspective.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcos
>
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#localizatio
----
David Clarke

Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 11:45:04 UTC