- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:15:04 -0500
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, "Martin Duerst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <public-iri@w3.org>
Martin, Since several important XML related specs will be depending on the updated IRI RFC, could you give us your best idea of schedules. thanks, paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul > Sent: Monday, 2007 November 26 9:52 > To: Martin Duerst > Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; > public-iri@w3.org > Subject: RE: Proposed resolution of HRRI/IRI discussion > (expected schedule) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Martin Duerst > > Sent: Monday, 2007 November 19 20:50 > > To: Henry S. Thompson > > Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; > > public-iri@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Proposed resolution of HRRI/IRI discussion > > Martin, > > With only a few relatively minor wording issues remaining, > it looks like the XML Core WG will be able to reference the > definition of LEIRIs from your upcoming revision of the > IRI RFC from the various XML related Recommendations that > need to do so (XML 1.0, XML 1.1, XML Base, XLink 1.1, and > XInclude). > > We are particularly interested in being able to reference > the definition of LEIRIs from XML Base and XLink 1.1 since > those have been sitting at PER and PR respectively for years. > > We are planning to reissue drafts of those specs referencing > LEIRIs as soon as you can make available another ID. We will > then need to investigate how much further we can progress > our specs until the revised IRI spec is really an RFC. > > Can you please give us your best guess as to when we can > expected the next ID and when the revised IRI spec > might become an RFC so that we can plan our schedule. > > Thanks, > > paul > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 17:15:40 UTC