- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:52:06 -0500
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <public-iri@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Duerst > Sent: Monday, 2007 November 19 20:50 > To: Henry S. Thompson > Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org; > public-iri@w3.org > Subject: Re: Proposed resolution of HRRI/IRI discussion Martin, With only a few relatively minor wording issues remaining, it looks like the XML Core WG will be able to reference the definition of LEIRIs from your upcoming revision of the IRI RFC from the various XML related Recommendations that need to do so (XML 1.0, XML 1.1, XML Base, XLink 1.1, and XInclude). We are particularly interested in being able to reference the definition of LEIRIs from XML Base and XLink 1.1 since those have been sitting at PER and PR respectively for years. We are planning to reissue drafts of those specs referencing LEIRIs as soon as you can make available another ID. We will then need to investigate how much further we can progress our specs until the revised IRI spec is really an RFC. Can you please give us your best guess as to when we can expected the next ID and when the revised IRI spec might become an RFC so that we can plan our schedule. Thanks, paul
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 15:52:33 UTC