RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: XML 1.01

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] 
 Sent: 04 November 2007 05:09
 To: Richard Ishida
 Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
 Subject: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Public Working Draft of May, 2007
 
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com]
  Sent: 04 November 2007 05:09
 ...
  Please review our resolutions for the following comments, 
 and reply to  us by 19 November 2007 at 
 public-comments-wcag20@w3.org to say whether  you are 
 satisfied. Note that this list is publicly archived.
 ...
  WCAG 2.0 Editor's Draft of May-October 2007 at  
 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20071102/
  
 ...
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Comment 5: XML 1.0 Reference
> Source: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/200
7Jun/0032.html
> (Issue ID: 1963)
> ----------------------------
> Original Comment:
> ----------------------------
> 
> > Comment from the i18n review of:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/
> >
> > Comment 14
> > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-wcag2-techniques/
> > Editorial/substantive: S
> > Owner: RI
> >
> > Location in reviewed document:
> > H58, Resources
> >
> > Comment:
> > This is a strange version number, and the link points to the First 
> > Edition, whereas we are up to the 3rd edition now, and soon 4th. 
> > Please point to the generic URI 
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-lang-tag
> 
> =================================
> > From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com]
> > Sent: 18 May 2007 00:43
> > To: Richard Ishida
> > Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
> > Subject: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April
> > 2006 (2 of 2)
> > Comment 24:
> 
> > ----------------------------
> > Response from Working Group:
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > The link has been updated as proposed.
> 
> The link is now good, but the link text refers to XML 1.01 - 
> that should probably be XML 1.0.
 
 ---------------------------------------------
 Response from Working Group:
 ---------------------------------------------
 
 Thanks. The link text has been updated as proposed.
 

Received on Friday, 16 November 2007 15:05:32 UTC