- From: Jonathan Rosenne <rosennej@qsm.co.il>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:58:36 +0200
- To: "'WWW International'" <www-international@w3.org>, "'W3C Offices'" <w3c-office-pr@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Non-ASCII IDNs with ASCII TLDs are not non-ASCII IDNs and are just a curiosity. They do not help the users who do know English and do not know the Latin letters. Jony > -----Original Message----- > From: www-international-request@w3.org [mailto:www-international- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Duerst > Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 4:35 AM > To: Daniel Dardailler > Cc: Najib Tounsi; 'WWW International'; W3C Offices; public-i18n- > core@w3.org > Subject: Re: Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) in progress > > > At 01:11 07/10/27, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > >> Also, on a second level, > >> many IDN labels already exist, without any big problems. > > > >Speaking of which, I've seen a CENTER > > Can you give a URI for CENTER? This is a word that just doesn't > work as such in a search engine. > > >study a year or so ago on penetration of > >second level IDN in ccTLDs that allowed them, and it was not very > good, a few > >digit% compared to non IDN. > > This is very understandable. At the 2004 ICANN meeting in Kuala Lumpur > (the only ICANN meeting I ever participated), I identified the lack of > non-ASCII TLDs and IE6 (which doesn't support IDNs unless you install > a plugin) as the two blocking factors for wide IDN usage. The IE6 > market > shares reported are still between 20% and 50%, and non-ASCII TLDs not > available yet, such low numbers come at no surprise to me. > > Regards, Martin. > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp > mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp >
Received on Monday, 29 October 2007 03:59:17 UTC