- From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:29:10 -0500
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Richard Ishida wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org >> Sent: 27 June 2006 19:49 >> To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org >> Subject: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 links >> >> >> Comment from the i18n review of: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/ >> >> Comment 6 >> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-wcag2-techniques/ >> Editorial/substantive: S >> Owner: RI >> >> Location in reviewed document: >> H57, H58, Resources >> >> Comment: >> There is a pointer to RFC 3066 'Tags for the Identification >> of Languages'. This specification has now been superceded by >> RFC3066bis, although, unfortunately, there is no number for >> the new RFC just yet. We suggest that you add a new link as >> soon as possible. >> >> >> In the meantime, you may wish to point to >> http://www.w3.org/International/core/langtags/rfc3066bis.html > > ================================= >> From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] >> Sent: 18 May 2007 00:43 >> To: Richard Ishida >> Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org >> Subject: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April >> 2006 (2 of 2) > >> Comment 17: > >> ---------------------------- >> Response from Working Group: >> ---------------------------- >> >> We have updated the reference to refer to the updated RFC 4646. > > > Now that things have settled down, the best strategy is to replace all links > to RFC 4646 with links to BCP 47. RFC 4646 will be replaced fairly soon with > another RFC, but BCP 47 will continue to refer to the latest relevant RFC. > The link is: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt > > You can still use the same title as the link text. > > Hope that helps. Thank you for the updated references. We have included them in an updated draft. All the best, -Ben -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 16:29:35 UTC