Re: Best Practise doc ready for publication?

Hi Richard,
only a note.


for this:
http://www.w3.org/International/geo/html-tech/tech-lang.html#ri20040429.092928424

For HTML use the lang attribute only, for XHTML 1.0 served as text/html use 
the lang and xml:lang attributes, and for XHTML served as XML use the 
xml:lang attribute only.


I suggest also to put a reference to the official  XHTML 1.0 SE spec.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_7

Use both the lang and xml:lang attributes when specifying the language of an 
element. The value of the xml:lang attribute takes precedence.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
To: "GEO" <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Cc: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 5:32 PM
Subject: Best Practise doc ready for publication?



Chaps,

I worked some more on the document

Internationalization Best Practices: Specifying Language in XHTML & HTML 
Content
http://www.w3.org/International/geo/html-tech/tech-lang.html

and its related tests and results pages, over the past week, and I think it 
is ready for publication as a WG Note.  The decision to publish will now 
have to be taken by the recharted Core WG, but please could you take a look 
at this before the telecon tomorrow and let me know whether you are in 
agreement that it can be published?

Thanks,
RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/693 - Release Date: 19/02/2007 
17:01






-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.2/692 - Release Date: 18/02/2007 
16.35

Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 17:03:26 UTC