[EMMA] i18n comment: Definition of URI not normative

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-emma-20070409/

Comment 6
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-emma/
Editorial/substantive: S
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
2.1 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-emma-20070409/#s4.2.5]
definition of URI informative

Comment: 
A definition of URI is given in the Terminology section that defines it in terms of RFC 3986 and XML Schema Part 2:Datatypes, but that section is not normative. We think the definition of URI should be normative.

Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 08:44:01 UTC