- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 09:26:29 +0100
- To: www-multimodal@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-emma-20070409/ Comment 2 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-emma/ Editorial/substantive: S Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 4.2.5 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-emma-20070409/#s4.2.5] Comment: It's not at all clear to us what the difference is between emma:lang and xml:lang, the relationship between them, or when we should use which. (It might help to create examples that show the use of xml:lang as well as emma:lang.) [[In order handle inputs involving multiple languages, such as through code switching, the emma:lang tag MAY contain several language identifiers separated by spaces.]] This is definitely something you cannot do with xml:lang, but we are wondering what is the value of doing it anyway. We are not sure what benefit it would provide.
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 08:41:05 UTC