- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:58:17 +0900
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
... are at http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html and below as text.
Felix
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
i18n core WG
24 Apr 2007
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Apr/0025.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-irc
Attendees
Present
Greg, Tom, Richard, Francois, Dave, Najib, Felix
Regrets
Vijay, Karunesh, Michael
Chair
Richard
Scribe
Felix
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Agenda & actions review
2. [6]Info Share
3. [7]New last call WDs
4. [8]'Homework'/Agenda Build page
5. [9]Unicode in XML and other Markup Languages
6. [10]SVG WG comments on the 06 Nov CSS21 WD - issue 6
7. [11]ITS WG input to EMMA review
8. [12]Tagging text with no language information
9. [13]CSS reference to Unicode vs ISO 10646
10. [14]CSS out of range unicode escapes
11. [15]EMMA review
12. [16]AOB
* [17]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
Planned agenda taken from [18]http://esw.w3.org/topic/coreHomework:
Topic: Unicode in XML and other Markup Languages
[18] http://esw.w3.org/topic/coreHomework
http://www.unicode.org/~asmus/other/w3c/tr20-8d9.html
Objective: APPROVE FOR PUBLICATION
Topic: SVG WG comments on the 06 Nov CSS21 WD - issue 6
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
Discuss. Added by Felix.
Topic: ITS WG input to EMMA review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/00
07.html
Christian is asking whether i18n core wants to send his comments
as part of its review of EMMA.
Topic: Tagging text with no language information
http://esw.w3.org/topic/geoNoLanguageTag
Currently in discussion
Topic: CSS reference to Unicode vs ISO 10646
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0052.html
Any issue here ?
Topic: CSS out of range unicode escapes
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0045.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0054.html
Any issue here ?
Agenda & actions review
<r007a> See [19]http://esw.w3.org/topic/coreHomework
[19] http://esw.w3.org/topic/coreHomework
<r007a> ACTION: Andrew, read comments for What should I consider wrt
moving to UTF-8?
[20]http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.en.php
and seek resolutions and propose necessary edits [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action11] PENDING
[20] http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.en.php
[21] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action11
<r007a> ACTION: David, redraft What is encoding, and why should I
[22]http://esw.w3.org/topic/geoEncoding for 1st May recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action02] PENDING
[22] http://esw.w3.org/topic/geoEncoding
[23] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action02
<r007a> ACTION: Felix, send comments we discussed to SPARQL folks
([24]http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20070326/#func-la
ngMatches) [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action13] DONE
[24]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20070326/#func-langMatches)
[25] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action13
<najib> hi everybody,
<r007a> ACTION: Felix, send private email to XML SChema to discuss
point 2 in
[26]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Mar/003
0.html and look at creating a page describing the proposal later
[recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action12] PENDING
[26]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Mar/0030.html
[27] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action12
<r007a> ACTION: RI, publish What should I consider wrt moving to
UTF-8?
[28]http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.html
[recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action11] PENDING
[28] http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.html
[29] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action11
<r007a> ACTION: Richard, consider a F2F since it has been awhile.
Before or at same time as plenary? [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action13] PENDING
[30] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action13
Info Share
<GregAaron> no news...
Richard: if you want to participate in "Internationalization and
Unicode Conference" , please submit and abstract ASAP
... deadline was yesterday
<r007a> [31]http://www.unicodeconference.org/
[31] http://www.unicodeconference.org/
Richard: conference dates October 15-17
... submit something today if possible
New last call WDs
<r007a> Semantic Annotations for WSDL and XML Schema
<r007a> [32]http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-sawsdl-20070410/
[32] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-sawsdl-20070410/
<r007a> 10 April 2007, Last Call Ends 1 May 2007
felix: only a namespace change in that draft, no need to look at
that
'Homework'/Agenda Build page
<r007a> [33]http://esw.w3.org/topic/coreHomework
[33] http://esw.w3.org/topic/coreHomework
Unicode in XML and other Markup Languages
<r007a> *
<r007a> [34]http://www.unicode.org/~asmus/other/w3c/tr20-8d9.html
[34] http://www.unicode.org/~asmus/other/w3c/tr20-8d9.html
<r007a> Objective: APPROVE FOR PUBLICATION
Richard: looking for agreement to publish this on 3rd of May
... Felix sent out a mail last week Monday, any comments now?
... agreement to publish this?
Francois: agreed
<najib> +1
RESOLUTION: WG agrees with publication of the update of Unicode in
XML ... as WG note
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to prepare Unicode in XML .. WG Note for
publication [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action07]
SVG WG comments on the 06 Nov CSS21 WD - issue 6
<r007a> *
<r007a>
[36]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
[36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
<r007a> Discuss. Added by Felix.
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to follow up on "SVG WG comments on the 06
Nov CSS21 WD - issue 6" topic [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action08]
ITS WG input to EMMA review
<r007a> *
<r007a>
[38]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0
007.html Christian is asking whether i18n core wants to send his
comments as part of its review of EMMA.
[38]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2007AprJun/0007.html
Richard: first question: should core make these comments instead of
ITS WG?
... I don't think core needs to do that
Felix: agree
... ITS will make more comments about ITS in other W3C specs
Richard: would they make a review page like core?
Felix: possibly not, but I'll aks
Richard: they should send comments separately, one per mail
... another question: how do we get informed? Copied on all mail
exchanges etc?
... opinions?
Francois: no opinion
... would not mind to be copied on these threads
Richard: Greg?
Felix: I'd propose that the ITS WG puts i18n core into CC for
comments sent out
Richard: sounds fine by me
... another comment on XML Schema and ITS
agreement to have this comment also via the ITS WG (if they want to
make it) and keep i18n core in the loop
Tagging text with no language information
<r007a> *
<r007a> [39]http://esw.w3.org/topic/geoNoLanguageTag
[39] http://esw.w3.org/topic/geoNoLanguageTag
<r007a> Currently in discussion
Richard: lot's of discussion about e.g. xml:lang="und" vs.
xml:lang=""
... still working on it, getting help from Mark
CSS reference to Unicode vs ISO 10646
<r007a> *
<r007a>
[40]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0052.html
[40] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0052.html
<r007a> Any issue here ?
Felix: the LTRU group made some changes to the latest BCP 47 draft
related to that, but not sure what the outcome is
Francois: maybe issue 79 needs our attention, see
[41]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
... they say "pointing to Unicode is sufficient"
[41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
Richard: not clear about this either. They have references to
Unicode and ISO
Francois: normative or not?
Richard: normative
<r007a> [42]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CSS21-20061106
[42] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CSS21-20061106
<r007a> [43]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CSS21-20061106/refs.html#q1
[43] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CSS21-20061106/refs.html#q1
Richard: both in the normative section
disucssion between Richard and Francois on the draft
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to sent a mail to CSS about the CSS 2.1
issue related to Unicode references [recorded in
[44]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action09]
Richard: issue 79
<r007a> "ISSUE-79: (not using IRI:s in CSS)
<r007a> Björns response:
[45]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0232
[45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Aug/0232
<r007a> SVG WG: The SVG WG will not further pursue this issue, but
recommends that
<r007a> the i18n WG reviews and acts on this issue if the resolution
is found
<r007a> unsatisfactory."
Richard: will discuss this next meeting
<r007a> ACTION: RI, make sure that it's clear we are talking about
issue 79 and get the right uri [recorded in
[46]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action10]
CSS out of range unicode escapes
<r007a> *
<r007a>
[47]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0045.html
[48]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0054.html
[47] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0045.html
[48] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0054.html
<r007a> Any issue here ?
Richard: postponed until next meeting
EMMA review
Richard: did not have much time to look at it, if you have any
thoughts on it, please send a mail to the public list
<GregAaron> take care until next time
AOB
adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Felix to prepare Unicode in XML .. WG Note for
publication [recorded in
[49]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: Francois to sent a mail to CSS about the CSS 2.1 issue
related to Unicode references [recorded in
[50]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: RI, make sure that it's clear we are talking about
issue 79 and get the right uri [recorded in
[51]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action10]
[NEW] ACTION: Richard to follow up on "SVG WG comments on the 06 Nov
CSS21 WD - issue 6" topic [recorded in
[52]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/24-core-minutes.html#action08]
[PENDING] ACTION: Andrew, read comments for What should I consider
wrt moving to UTF-8?
[53]http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.en.php
and seek resolutions and propose necessary edits [recorded in
[54]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action11]
[PENDING] ACTION: David, redraft What is encoding, and why should I
[55]http://esw.w3.org/topic/geoEncoding for 1st May recorded in
[56]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: Felix, send private email to XML SChema to discuss
point 2 in
[57]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Mar/003
0.html and look at creating a page describing the proposal later
[recorded in
[58]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action12]
[PENDING] ACTION: RI, publish What should I consider wrt moving to
UTF-8?
[59]http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.html
[recorded in
[60]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action11]
[PENDING] ACTION: Richard, consider a F2F since it has been awhile.
Before or at same time as plenary? [recorded in
[61]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action13]
[53] http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.en.php
[54] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action11
[55] http://esw.w3.org/topic/geoEncoding
[56] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action02
[57]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Mar/0030.html
[58] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action12
[59] http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-upgrade.html
[60] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action11
[61] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/10-core-minutes.html#action13
[DONE] ACTION: Felix, send comments we discussed to SPARQL folks
([62]http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20070326/#func-la
ngMatches) [recorded in
[63]http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action13]
[62]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20070326/#func-langMatches
[63] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/17-core-minutes.html#action13
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [64]scribe.perl version 1.128
([65]CVS log)
$Date: 2007/04/24 14:56:15 $
[64] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[65] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 14:58:27 UTC