- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:44:33 -0700
- To: fsasaki@w3.org
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, andy.seaborne@hp.com, Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Message-ID: <20070421234433.GC2194@w3.org>
* Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> [2007-04-21 16:23-0700] > * fsasaki@w3.org <fsasaki@w3.org> [2007-04-19 22:25+0900] > > > > Comment from the i18n review of: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20070326/ > > > > Comment 2 > > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-sparql/ > > Editorial/substantive: S > > Location in reviewed document: > > Sec. 2.3.1 > > Renaming Section on \"Matching Language Tags\" > > > > Comment: > > > > The section title \"Matching Language Tags\" implies matching against language ranges, see comment 3 at > > http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-sparql/ [http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-sparql/] > > . However, sec. 2.3.1 does not describe sub tag matching, but only identity of a language tag and given data. Rename proposal: \"Matching the Identity ofLanguage Tags\". > > We use "matches" pretty consistently through the document, though we have a normative ref to 4647 which somewhat coopts the term "matching", especially wrt language tags. Nevertheless, I feel that using a synonym for "matches" on just this section would cost consistency and comprehensibility. > > I hacked up some modifications to §2.3 (attached) which make the section actually cover 4647.matches. These changes end up referencing SPARQL functions long before they are introduced (§3) so I don't think this is a good idea. Did I say "attached"? I have the attention span of a gnat. > I think a better solution is to rename 3.1-3.3 to > * 2.3.1 Matching Literals with Language Tags > * 2.3.2 Matching Literals with Numeric Types > * 2.3.3 Matching Literals with Arbitrary Datatypes > which indicates that we are matching RDF terms. > > Does this latter solution satisfy you? If so, please respond to this message, prefixing the Subject: with "[CLOSED]". (I forgot to ask you to do that for Comment 1.) > -- > -eric > > office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA > mobile: +1.617.599.3509 > > (eric@w3.org) > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than > email address distribution. -- -eric office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA mobile: +1.617.599.3509 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Attachments
- text/html attachment: §2.3.html
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2007 23:45:01 UTC